Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Beyond Religious Narcissistic Identification: Agnostic and Atheistic Narcissism

  • Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska
  • , Jarosław Piotrowski
  • , Bartłomiej Nowak
  • , Vassilis Saroglou
  • , John Maltby
  • , Constantine Sedikides
  • , Mladen Adamovic
  • , Nur Amali Aminnuddin
  • , Seth Christopher Yaw Appiah
  • , Rahkman Ardi
  • , Zana Hasan Babakr
  • , Einar Baldvin Baldursson
  • , Sergiu Bălțătescu
  • , Muhammed Bilgehan Aytaç
  • , Aidos Bolatov
  • , Bruno Bonfá-Araujo
  • , Matthias Burghart
  • , Phatthanakit Chobthamkit
  • , Marilyn Clark
  • , Magali Clobert
  • Richard G. Cowden, Jesus Alonso Datu, Sandesh Dhakal, Sonya Dragova-Koleva, Begoña Espejo, Dmitry Grigoryev, Emanuela Gritti, Katherine Gundolf, Rishad Habib, Md Imran Hossain, Luis Carlos Jaume, Dzintra Iliško, Naved Iqbal, Veljko Jovanović, Tomislav Jukić, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Narine Khachatryan, Emil Knezović, Monika Kovacs, Heather A. Kumove, Walaa Labib M. Eldesoki, Aitor Larzabal Fernandez, Norman Li, Uri Lifshin, Kadi Liik, Maxim Likhanov, Agim Mamuti, Rasmus Mannerström, Alison J. Marganski, Marta Martín Carbonell, Maia Mestvirishvili, Chanki Moon, Kostas A. Papageorgiou, Joonha Park, Pablo Pérez de León, Rogelio Puente-Díaz, Jano Ramos-Diaz, Troy Smith, Gashaw Tesfa, Kiều Thị Thanh Trà, Habib Tiliouine, Robert Tomšik, Charles S. Umeh, Tadas Vadvilavičius, Kees van den Bos, Alain van Hiel, Anna Wlodarczyk, Zahir Vally, Christin Melanie Vauclair, Illia Yahiiaiev, Fatemeh Zand
  • Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University
  • Department of Psychology
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • School of Healthcare
  • University of Leicester
  • University of Southampton
  • Department of Psychology
  • Sogang University
  • King's College London
  • Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  • Department of Sociology and Social Work
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
  • Department of Psychology
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Department of Psychology
  • Soran University
  • Institute of Communication and Culture
  • Aalborg University
  • Department of Sociology and Social Work
  • University of Oradea
  • Communication Faculty
  • Aksaray University
  • Department of Science
  • Department of Forensic Psychology
  • Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
  • Department of Criminology
  • Department of Psychology
  • Thammasat University
  • Department of Psychology
  • University of Malta
  • Department of Psychology
  • Department of Psychology
  • Harvard University
  • Department of Psychology
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Central Department of Psychology
  • Tribhuvan University
  • Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology
  • New Bulgarian University
  • Department of Behavioral Sciences
  • University of Valencia
  • Department of Humanities
  • University of Urbino
  • Department of Psychology
  • Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences
  • Toronto Metropolitan University
  • Department of Psychology
  • University of Chittagong
  • Instituto de investigaciones- Facultad de Psicología
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Daugavpils University
  • Department of Psychology
  • Department of Psychology
  • University of Novi Sad
  • Department of Psychology
  • Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
  • Department of Psychology
  • Karnatak University
  • Department of Psychology
  • Yerevan State University
  • Department of Psychology
  • International University of Sarajevo
  • Institute of Intercultural Psychology and Education
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Department of Psychology
  • Menoufia University
  • Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • University of the Basque Country
  • School of Social Sciences
  • Singapore Management University
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Department of Psychology
  • Tallinn University
  • Aix-Marseille Université
  • Faculty of Psychology
  • University of Helsinki
  • Le Moyne College
  • Programa Psicología
  • Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
  • Department of Psychology
  • Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
  • Department of Psychology
  • Jeonbuk National University
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Kyoto University
  • Universidad Católica del Uruguay
  • School of Business and Economics
  • Universidad Anáhuac
  • Humanities Division
  • Addis Ababa Science and Technology University
  • Department of Psychology
  • Ho Chi Minh City University of Education
  • Department of Psychology
  • University of Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella
  • Department of Research and Methodological Activities
  • University of Lagos
  • Department of Psychology
  • Vytautas Magnus University
  • Utrecht University
  • Department of Psychology
  • Ghent University
  • Escuela de Psicología
  • Universidad Católica del Norte
  • Department of Psychology
  • Department of Psychology
  • University Institute of Lisbon
  • Faculty of Psychology
  • Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University
  • Department of Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Agnosticism and atheism are often grouped simply as nonreligious identities, yet emerging research highlights their distinct psychological profiles and social implications. Among these distinctions, collective narcissism–characterized by strong attachment to one’s group, exceptionalism, and grievance for recognition–offers a framework for understanding identity processes in both nonreligious groups. We examined whether agnostics and atheists exhibit collective narcissism and its forms (agentic–focused on exceptional effectiveness; communal–focused on exceptional morality) similarly to believers. We explored cross-denominational variance in agentic and communal collective narcissism levels relying on data from 77 countries (N = 3,570; 1227 agnostics, 2343 atheists). Agnostics and atheists from secular countries reported lower collective (particularly agentic) narcissism relative to their counterparts from religious countries. Further, agnostics and atheists were higher on communal than agentic collective narcissism. The results highlight the utility of the agency-communion model of collective narcissism among nonbelievers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-555
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Religious Narcissistic Identification: Agnostic and Atheistic Narcissism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this