TY - GEN
T1 - ChatGPT
T2 - International Conference on Communication and Applied Technologies, ICOMTA 2024
AU - Clavijo-Correa, Jorge Eder
AU - Alarcón-Llontop, Luis Rolando
AU - Poderoso-Acuña, Anita
AU - Flores-Mostacero, Fátima
AU - Ruiz-Navarro, Karen
AU - Rodríguez-Escobal, Karina
AU - Cabellos-Briones, Flor
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The research sought to analyze the ethics in the use of ChatGPT, in university students of the communication faculties of Trujillo (Peru), from the deontological and university ethics, and teaching and learning; and also, to propose competencies and skills for undergraduate university teachers for the proper use of this artificial intelligence (AI) in their students. The study complies with the integrationist paradigm, a mixed approach. It used, on the one hand, the survey technique, with an online questionnaire of 27 questions that covered six dimensions of the deontological and university ethics category of Morales et al. [1] and three dimensions of the teaching–learning category of Navarro et al. (2023). The sample was 220 students from five universities; and, on the other hand, 14 specialists in higher education were interviewed under the question guide. The university students consider that they have the right to use ChatGPT; however, it does not allow them to develop cognitive skills, and they admit that, after using the application, they present findings as their own, which indicates unethical actions. It is concluded that the use of ChatGPT will be ethical in the teaching–learning process as long as the university students incorporate the guidance and feedback of their teachers, to exploit the IAG tools for their deontological, cognitive, and social development.
AB - The research sought to analyze the ethics in the use of ChatGPT, in university students of the communication faculties of Trujillo (Peru), from the deontological and university ethics, and teaching and learning; and also, to propose competencies and skills for undergraduate university teachers for the proper use of this artificial intelligence (AI) in their students. The study complies with the integrationist paradigm, a mixed approach. It used, on the one hand, the survey technique, with an online questionnaire of 27 questions that covered six dimensions of the deontological and university ethics category of Morales et al. [1] and three dimensions of the teaching–learning category of Navarro et al. (2023). The sample was 220 students from five universities; and, on the other hand, 14 specialists in higher education were interviewed under the question guide. The university students consider that they have the right to use ChatGPT; however, it does not allow them to develop cognitive skills, and they admit that, after using the application, they present findings as their own, which indicates unethical actions. It is concluded that the use of ChatGPT will be ethical in the teaching–learning process as long as the university students incorporate the guidance and feedback of their teachers, to exploit the IAG tools for their deontological, cognitive, and social development.
KW - ChatGPT
KW - Ethics
KW - Teaching and learning
KW - Teaching skills and competencies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003207436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-981-96-0426-5_20
DO - 10.1007/978-981-96-0426-5_20
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105003207436
SN - 9789819604258
T3 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
SP - 233
EP - 245
BT - Communication and Applied Technologies - Proceedings of ICOMTA 2024
A2 - Ibáñez, Daniel Barredo
A2 - Gallardo-Echenique, Eliana
A2 - Siringoringo, Hotniar
A2 - Diez, Nieves Lagares
Y2 - 4 September 2024 through 6 September 2024
ER -