TY - GEN
T1 - Comparative Analysis of the Admissible Capacity in Surface Foundations with the Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic Equations by Triaxial Compression Test, in the Cajabamba - Cajabamba - Cajamarca District
AU - Estheysi Benites Layza, Jheny
AU - Yoel Soto Villena, Yerson
AU - Josué Villanueva Bazán, Henrry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The objective of this research is to compare the values of the admissible capacity in shallow foundations using the equations of Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic, based on the characteristics of the soil in the "El Mirador" Urbanization in the Cajabamba District.For this purpose, seven pits were carried out, in which the following tests were carried out: moisture content, natural density, specific weight, granulometric analysis, plasticity indices and triaxial compression; allowing to classify the soil using the SUCS system, stratum one and two as poorly graded sand (SP) and well graded sand (SW) respectively and also calculate the admissible capacity of the soil, using the methods of Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic.And the following values were obtained: for Df=1.50 m and B=1.00 m, values that range between 8.06 kg/cm2 and 10.98 kg/cm2; Df=1.50 m and B=1.50 m between 8.25 kg/cm2 and 11.30 kg/cm2; Df=1.50 m and B=2.00 m between 8.43 kg/cm2 and 11.46 kg/cm2; Df=2.00 m and B=1.00 m between 8.63 kg/cm2 and 11.65 kg/cm2; Df=2.00 m and B=1.50 m between 8.82 kg/cm2 and 11.68 kg/cm2 and for Df=2.00 m and B=2.00 m between 9.00 kg/cm2 and 11.97 kg/cm2.It is concluded that the Terzaghi and Hansen method provides greater structural safety.
AB - The objective of this research is to compare the values of the admissible capacity in shallow foundations using the equations of Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic, based on the characteristics of the soil in the "El Mirador" Urbanization in the Cajabamba District.For this purpose, seven pits were carried out, in which the following tests were carried out: moisture content, natural density, specific weight, granulometric analysis, plasticity indices and triaxial compression; allowing to classify the soil using the SUCS system, stratum one and two as poorly graded sand (SP) and well graded sand (SW) respectively and also calculate the admissible capacity of the soil, using the methods of Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic.And the following values were obtained: for Df=1.50 m and B=1.00 m, values that range between 8.06 kg/cm2 and 10.98 kg/cm2; Df=1.50 m and B=1.50 m between 8.25 kg/cm2 and 11.30 kg/cm2; Df=1.50 m and B=2.00 m between 8.43 kg/cm2 and 11.46 kg/cm2; Df=2.00 m and B=1.00 m between 8.63 kg/cm2 and 11.65 kg/cm2; Df=2.00 m and B=1.50 m between 8.82 kg/cm2 and 11.68 kg/cm2 and for Df=2.00 m and B=2.00 m between 9.00 kg/cm2 and 11.97 kg/cm2.It is concluded that the Terzaghi and Hansen method provides greater structural safety.
KW - Admissible capacity
KW - Hansen
KW - Meyerhof
KW - Terzaghi
KW - Vesic
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85203795724
U2 - 10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.1104
DO - 10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.1104
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85203795724
T3 - Proceedings of the LACCEI international Multi-conference for Engineering, Education and Technology
BT - Proceedings of the 22nd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology
T2 - 22nd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, LACCEI 2024
Y2 - 17 July 2024 through 19 July 2024
ER -