CrowdLaw y democracia deliberativa: reflexiones sobre la legitimación democrática de las decisiones públicas mediante las nuevas tecnologías

Alfonso Renato Vargas Murillo; Enlil Iván Herrera Pérez; Ilda Nadia Mónica de la Asunción Pari Bedoya

doi:10.18566/rfdcp.v52n136.a01

CrowdLaw y democracia deliberativa: reflexiones sobre la legitimación democrática de las decisiones públicas mediante las nuevas tecnologías

Translated title of the contribution: CrowdLaw and deliberative democracy: reflections on the democratic legitimation of public decisions through new technologies

Alfonso Renato Vargas Murillo, Enlil Iván Herrera Pérez, Ilda Nadia Mónica de la Asunción Pari Bedoya

Universidad Privada de Tacna

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

CrowdLaw emerged in recent years as a proposal based on the application of a series of methods and tools that use new technologies as a basis to generate an interaction between citizens and public institutions in political decision-making processes. It is hypothesized that this proposal for citizen participation in political decision-making has the potential to satisfy the conditions proposed by deliberative democracy to legitimize political decisions. However, its success in terms of endings, can only happen if it is accompanied by a process to overcome the digital divide and inequality, as occurs in the case of Internet access.

Translated title of the contribution	CrowdLaw and deliberative democracy: reflections on the democratic legitimation of public decisions through new technologies
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	1-23
Number of pages	23
Journal	Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas
Volume	52
Issue number	136
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18566/rfdcp.v52n136.a01
State	Published - 1 Jul 2022
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.18566/rfdcp.v52n136.a01

Cite this

@article{ec55aa03f43b43278ca4042bd8c65bb7,

title = "CrowdLaw y democracia deliberativa: reflexiones sobre la legitimaci{\'o}n democr{\'a}tica de las decisiones p{\'u}blicas mediante las nuevas tecnolog{\'i}as",

abstract = "CrowdLaw emerged in recent years as a proposal based on the application of a series of methods and tools that use new technologies as a basis to generate an interaction between citizens and public institutions in political decision-making processes. It is hypothesized that this proposal for citizen participation in political decision-making has the potential to satisfy the conditions proposed by deliberative democracy to legitimize political decisions. However, its success in terms of endings, can only happen if it is accompanied by a process to overcome the digital divide and inequality, as occurs in the case of Internet access.",

keywords = "Crowdlaw, deliberation, democracy, legitimacy, technology",

author = "{Vargas Murillo}, {Alfonso Renato} and {Herrera P{\'e}rez}, {Enlil Iv{\'a}n} and {de la Asunci{\'o}n Pari Bedoya}, {Ilda Nadia M{\'o}nica}",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.18566/rfdcp.v52n136.a01",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "52",

pages = "1--23",

journal = "Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas",

issn = "0120-3886",

number = "136",

}

CrowdLaw y democracia deliberativa: reflexiones sobre la legitimación democrática de las decisiones públicas mediante las nuevas tecnologías. / Vargas Murillo, Alfonso Renato; Herrera Pérez, Enlil Iván; de la Asunción Pari Bedoya, Ilda Nadia Mónica.
In: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas, Vol. 52, No. 136, 01.07.2022, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - CrowdLaw y democracia deliberativa

T2 - reflexiones sobre la legitimación democrática de las decisiones públicas mediante las nuevas tecnologías

AU - Vargas Murillo, Alfonso Renato

AU - Herrera Pérez, Enlil Iván

AU - de la Asunción Pari Bedoya, Ilda Nadia Mónica

PY - 2022/7/1

Y1 - 2022/7/1

N2 - CrowdLaw emerged in recent years as a proposal based on the application of a series of methods and tools that use new technologies as a basis to generate an interaction between citizens and public institutions in political decision-making processes. It is hypothesized that this proposal for citizen participation in political decision-making has the potential to satisfy the conditions proposed by deliberative democracy to legitimize political decisions. However, its success in terms of endings, can only happen if it is accompanied by a process to overcome the digital divide and inequality, as occurs in the case of Internet access.

AB - CrowdLaw emerged in recent years as a proposal based on the application of a series of methods and tools that use new technologies as a basis to generate an interaction between citizens and public institutions in political decision-making processes. It is hypothesized that this proposal for citizen participation in political decision-making has the potential to satisfy the conditions proposed by deliberative democracy to legitimize political decisions. However, its success in terms of endings, can only happen if it is accompanied by a process to overcome the digital divide and inequality, as occurs in the case of Internet access.

KW - Crowdlaw

KW - deliberation

KW - democracy

KW - legitimacy

KW - technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175377548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18566/rfdcp.v52n136.a01

DO - 10.18566/rfdcp.v52n136.a01

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85175377548

SN - 0120-3886

VL - 52

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas

JF - Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas

IS - 136

ER -

CrowdLaw y democracia deliberativa: reflexiones sobre la legitimación democrática de las decisiones públicas mediante las nuevas tecnologías

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this