TY - JOUR
T1 - Ejecución y cumplimiento de la pena de prestación de servicios a la comunidad
AU - Riega-Virú, Yasmina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - The objective of this research was to determine the correlation between compliance with the punishment and implementation of standards. 150 records were reviewed with judgment in Lima. Among the results obtained that the INPE 31% takes into account the skills of those sentenced to assign community work, 69% assigned outside their community work skills; 70% is monitored discontinuously and 30% on a monthly basis; omitting to inform the judge about the work of sentenced monthly. 77% of entities receiving does not return the forms of job control those sentenced, 33% if you do; 54% not assigned specific tasks, 46% located in specific tasks; 2% sentenced presents a very unfavorable attitude toward the sentence imposed, 35% have an unfavorable attitude, 35 % have a favorable attitude and 28 % very favorable attitude. Finally, the test result of the Pearson chi-square statistic (X2variables compliance or non-compliance of the provision referred to in Article 263 of Supreme Decree Núm. 015-2003-JUS- Rules of Criminal Execution Code - Enforcement of penalties to provide services to the community and limitation of days; and compliance or noncompliance with the judgment by providing sentenced to community service; a value X2 of 44.88, to establish that there is a correlation. It was concluded that the compliance of regulated process is associated with the failure of the penalty provision of services to the community.
AB - The objective of this research was to determine the correlation between compliance with the punishment and implementation of standards. 150 records were reviewed with judgment in Lima. Among the results obtained that the INPE 31% takes into account the skills of those sentenced to assign community work, 69% assigned outside their community work skills; 70% is monitored discontinuously and 30% on a monthly basis; omitting to inform the judge about the work of sentenced monthly. 77% of entities receiving does not return the forms of job control those sentenced, 33% if you do; 54% not assigned specific tasks, 46% located in specific tasks; 2% sentenced presents a very unfavorable attitude toward the sentence imposed, 35% have an unfavorable attitude, 35 % have a favorable attitude and 28 % very favorable attitude. Finally, the test result of the Pearson chi-square statistic (X2variables compliance or non-compliance of the provision referred to in Article 263 of Supreme Decree Núm. 015-2003-JUS- Rules of Criminal Execution Code - Enforcement of penalties to provide services to the community and limitation of days; and compliance or noncompliance with the judgment by providing sentenced to community service; a value X2 of 44.88, to establish that there is a correlation. It was concluded that the compliance of regulated process is associated with the failure of the penalty provision of services to the community.
KW - Execution of penalty
KW - Penalty provision of community services
KW - Receiving entities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978852672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2016.145.4996
DO - 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2016.145.4996
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:84978852672
SN - 0041-8633
VL - 49
SP - 195
EP - 226
JO - Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
JF - Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
IS - 145
ER -