Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global cross-cultural validation of a brief measure for identifying potential suicide risk in 42 countries

  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • University of Haifa
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas
  • University of Gibraltar
  • Yale University
  • Jaume I University
  • University of Montreal
  • University of Lausanne
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • University of Aveiro
  • University of Valencia
  • Fuzhou University
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • University of Hertfordshire
  • University of Trento
  • Auckland University of Technology
  • Nottingham Trent University
  • Kyoto University
  • RIKEN
  • HELP University
  • Charles University
  • Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of New Mexico
  • University of Baghdad
  • Jahangirnagar University
  • University of Zagreb
  • Pavol Jozef Šafárik University
  • University of Southampton
  • University of Galway
  • Hallym University
  • Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Universidad de Cuenca
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • Université d'Artois
  • Universidad de Talca
  • Universidad de Tarapacá
  • Florida State University
  • KU Leuven
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
  • SS Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
  • University of SS Cyril and Methodius, Trnava
  • University of Cape Town
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
  • Liverpool John Moores University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the P4 suicide screener in a multinational sample. The primary goal was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale and investigate its convergent validity by analyzing its correlation with depression, anxiety, and substance use. Study design: The study design is a cross-sectional self-report study conducted across 42 countries. Methods: A cross-sectional, self-report study was conducted in 42 countries, with a total of 82,243 participants included in the final data set. Results: The study provides an overview of suicide ideation rates across 42 countries and confirms the structural validity of the P4 screener. The findings indicated that sexual and gender minority individuals exhibited higher rates of suicidal ideation. The P4 screener showed adequate reliability, convergence, and discriminant validity, and a cutoff score of 1 is recommended to identify individuals at risk of suicidal behavior. Conclusions: The study supports the reliability and validity of the P4 suicide screener across 42 diverse countries, highlighting the importance of using a cross-cultural suicide risk assessment to standardize the identification of high-risk individuals and tailoring culturally sensitive suicide prevention strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-23
Number of pages11
JournalPublic Health
Volume229
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Cross-cultural
  • Suicide
  • Validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global cross-cultural validation of a brief measure for identifying potential suicide risk in 42 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this