TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning models for estimating fetal weight based on ultrasonographic biometry
T2 - Development and validation study
AU - Espinola-Sánchez, Marcos
AU - Limay-Rios, Antonio
AU - Campaña-Acuña, Andrés
AU - Sanca-Valeriano, Silvia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Background: Advances in machine learning (ML) offer an innovative approach to accurate fetal weight estimation by integrating multiple biometric and clinical variables. Objective: To develop and validate ML models for estimating fetal weight using biometric data obtained via ultrasonography, evaluating their accuracy and comparing them with traditional formulas, such as Hadlock and Shepard. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Maternal Perinatal Institute of Peru from 2009 to 2022, including 3525 low-risk pregnancies with singleton gestations. ML models, including Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest and TabPFN (Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network), were trained and validated using ultrasonographic measurements such as biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, femur length, and gestational age. Accuracy was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean squared error (MSE), comparing the ML models to the Hadlock and Shepard formulas. Results: Data from the first study stage (2009–2018) indicated that the TabPFN model was the most accurate (R² = 0.856; MSE = 0.146), outperforming the Hadlock (R² = 0.807; MSE = 0.195) and Shepard (R² = 0.801; MSE = 0.201) formulas. In the independent validation sample (2019–2022), TabPFN consistently outperformed other methods (R² = 0.873; MSE = 0.144). Model consistency was evaluated through cross-validation and randomization of samples. Conclusions: The TabPFN model outperformed traditional formulas, including Hadlock and Shepard, and other evaluated machine learning methods in estimating fetal weight. Its high predictive accuracy, robustness across temporally distinct cohorts, and independence from hyperparameter tuning support its potential as a reliable clinical decision-support tool in obstetric care.
AB - Background: Advances in machine learning (ML) offer an innovative approach to accurate fetal weight estimation by integrating multiple biometric and clinical variables. Objective: To develop and validate ML models for estimating fetal weight using biometric data obtained via ultrasonography, evaluating their accuracy and comparing them with traditional formulas, such as Hadlock and Shepard. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Maternal Perinatal Institute of Peru from 2009 to 2022, including 3525 low-risk pregnancies with singleton gestations. ML models, including Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest and TabPFN (Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network), were trained and validated using ultrasonographic measurements such as biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, femur length, and gestational age. Accuracy was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean squared error (MSE), comparing the ML models to the Hadlock and Shepard formulas. Results: Data from the first study stage (2009–2018) indicated that the TabPFN model was the most accurate (R² = 0.856; MSE = 0.146), outperforming the Hadlock (R² = 0.807; MSE = 0.195) and Shepard (R² = 0.801; MSE = 0.201) formulas. In the independent validation sample (2019–2022), TabPFN consistently outperformed other methods (R² = 0.873; MSE = 0.144). Model consistency was evaluated through cross-validation and randomization of samples. Conclusions: The TabPFN model outperformed traditional formulas, including Hadlock and Shepard, and other evaluated machine learning methods in estimating fetal weight. Its high predictive accuracy, robustness across temporally distinct cohorts, and independence from hyperparameter tuning support its potential as a reliable clinical decision-support tool in obstetric care.
KW - Fetal weight
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - machine learning
KW - perinatal care
KW - pregnancy
KW - prenatal
KW - ultrasonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004778646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/20552076251342012
DO - 10.1177/20552076251342012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105004778646
SN - 2055-2076
VL - 11
JO - Digital Health
JF - Digital Health
M1 - 20552076251342012
ER -