TY - GEN
T1 - Terapia con bacteriófagos, una evaluación de estudios de seguridad y eficacia
AU - Yupanqui Apolinario, Eduardo
AU - Gonzales Rivasplata, José Miguel
AU - Rodriguez, Sol A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© LEIRD 2025.All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This review examines phase I and II bacteriophage therapy clinical trials in MDR bacteria, analyzing their safety and efficacy in clinical studies conducted over the past seven years, from 2018 to 2024, assessing the safety and efficacy of bacteriophage therapy. The inclusion criteria for this review are detailed in the methodology. Likewise, evaluation criteria such as: type of phages used (single or bacteriophage cocktails), valency (monovalent or polyvalent), routes of administration (oral, intravenous, intraperitoneal, among others), dose and duration of treatment, follow-up times, efficacy assessment (in vitro, clinical studies), safety, and tolerability are also included. In conclusion, bacteriophage therapy reports clinical improvement in patients with severe infections, tolerability, and a lack of serious adverse events, especially in those patients who do not respond to conventional antibiotics. The results suggest that bacteriophage therapies have enormous potential for treating bacterial infections resistant to traditional antibiotics. However, the lack of clinical studies in this field hampers its standardization, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary approach for successful clinical implementation in future studies.
AB - This review examines phase I and II bacteriophage therapy clinical trials in MDR bacteria, analyzing their safety and efficacy in clinical studies conducted over the past seven years, from 2018 to 2024, assessing the safety and efficacy of bacteriophage therapy. The inclusion criteria for this review are detailed in the methodology. Likewise, evaluation criteria such as: type of phages used (single or bacteriophage cocktails), valency (monovalent or polyvalent), routes of administration (oral, intravenous, intraperitoneal, among others), dose and duration of treatment, follow-up times, efficacy assessment (in vitro, clinical studies), safety, and tolerability are also included. In conclusion, bacteriophage therapy reports clinical improvement in patients with severe infections, tolerability, and a lack of serious adverse events, especially in those patients who do not respond to conventional antibiotics. The results suggest that bacteriophage therapies have enormous potential for treating bacterial infections resistant to traditional antibiotics. However, the lack of clinical studies in this field hampers its standardization, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary approach for successful clinical implementation in future studies.
KW - Phage therapy
KW - bacteriophage therapy
KW - clinical study
KW - efficacy
KW - safety
KW - safety
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032412753
U2 - 10.18687/LEIRD2025.1.1.263
DO - 10.18687/LEIRD2025.1.1.263
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:105032412753
T3 - Proceedings of the LACCEI international Multi-conference for Engineering, Education and Technology
BT - Proceedings of the 5th LACCEI International Multiconference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development - Entrepreneurship with Purpose
A2 - Larrondo Petrie, Maria M.
A2 - Texier, Jose
A2 - Rivas Matta, Rodolfo Andr�s
T2 - 5th LACCEI International Multiconference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development - Entrepreneurship with Purpose: Social and Technological Innovation in the Age of AI, LEIRD 2025
Y2 - 1 December 2025 through 3 December 2025
ER -