THE NULL HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TEST AND THE DICHOTOMIZATION OF THE P-VALUE: Errare Humanum Est

Edward Mezones-Holguín, Ali Al-Kassab-córdova, Percy Soto-Becerra, Sonia Hernández-Díaz, Jay S. Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Decision-making in healthcare is complex and needs to be based on the best scientific evidence. In this pro-cess, information derived from statistical analysis of data is crucial, which can be developed from either frequentist or Bayesian perspectives. When it comes to the frequentist field, the null hypothesis significance test (NHST) and its p-value is one of the most widely used techniques in different disciplines. However, NHST has been subjected to questioning from different academic points of view, which has led to it being considered as one of the causes of the so-called replicability crisis in science. In this review article, we provide a brief historical account of its development, summarize the underlying methods, describe some controversies and limitations, address misuse and misinterpretation, and finally give some scopes and reflections in the context of biomedical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)422-430
Number of pages9
JournalRevista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology and Biostatistics
  • Hypothesis-Testing
  • Statistical Analysis
  • statistics & numerical data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE NULL HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TEST AND THE DICHOTOMIZATION OF THE P-VALUE: Errare Humanum Est'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this