TY - JOUR
T1 - Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence as a Teaching Strategy Among University Professors
T2 - The Role of Habit, Hedonic Motivation, and Competence for Technology Integration
AU - Acosta-Enriquez, Benicio Gonzalo
AU - Villena Zapata, Luigi Italo
AU - Huamaní Jordan, Olger
AU - López Roca, Carlos
AU - Cabrera Cipirán, Betty Margarita
AU - Saavedra Villacrez, Willy
AU - Arbulu Perez Vargas, Carmen Graciela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez et al. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The immersion of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents significant challenges and opportunities. This study examines the acceptance of AI as a teaching strategy among university teachers, following the extended UTAUT2 model with the inclusion of the teacher skills and knowledge for technology integration (SKTI) construct. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional research design, data were collected from 318 university teachers with prior experience using AI as a learning strategy through nonprobabilistic convenience sampling across 10 universities in northern Peru. Participants completed an online survey, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results showed that performance expectancy (β = 0.129∗∗), hedonic motivation (β = 0.167∗∗), habit (β = 0.405∗∗∗), and SKTI (β = 0.263∗∗∗) had a positive influence on the behavioral intention to adopt AI as a teaching strategy. Additionally, behavioral intention (β = 0.303∗∗∗), facilitating conditions (β = 0.115∗), and habit (β = 0.464∗∗) determine the behavioral use of AI by teachers. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences among age groups in the performance expectancy, social influence, habit, and behavioral intention constructs, with the 37- to 48-year-old age group showing higher average ranks. The discussion highlights that these findings suggest a positive adoption of AI among teachers, driven by individual and contextual factors, and challenges assumptions about the relevance of certain constructs in this specific context. In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in understanding the adoption of AI in university teaching and provides valuable guidance for practical implementation efforts.
AB - The immersion of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents significant challenges and opportunities. This study examines the acceptance of AI as a teaching strategy among university teachers, following the extended UTAUT2 model with the inclusion of the teacher skills and knowledge for technology integration (SKTI) construct. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional research design, data were collected from 318 university teachers with prior experience using AI as a learning strategy through nonprobabilistic convenience sampling across 10 universities in northern Peru. Participants completed an online survey, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results showed that performance expectancy (β = 0.129∗∗), hedonic motivation (β = 0.167∗∗), habit (β = 0.405∗∗∗), and SKTI (β = 0.263∗∗∗) had a positive influence on the behavioral intention to adopt AI as a teaching strategy. Additionally, behavioral intention (β = 0.303∗∗∗), facilitating conditions (β = 0.115∗), and habit (β = 0.464∗∗) determine the behavioral use of AI by teachers. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences among age groups in the performance expectancy, social influence, habit, and behavioral intention constructs, with the 37- to 48-year-old age group showing higher average ranks. The discussion highlights that these findings suggest a positive adoption of AI among teachers, driven by individual and contextual factors, and challenges assumptions about the relevance of certain constructs in this specific context. In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in understanding the adoption of AI in university teaching and provides valuable guidance for practical implementation efforts.
KW - acceptance
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - educational technology
KW - higher education
KW - university teachers
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012388671
U2 - 10.1155/hbe2/5933157
DO - 10.1155/hbe2/5933157
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012388671
SN - 2578-1863
VL - 2025
JO - Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
JF - Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
IS - 1
M1 - 5933157
ER -